Subject	That's my Z
Posted by	Good2Zya on January 30, 2001 at 7:05 PM
	This message has been viewed 11 times.
In Reply To	SCC has a 539rwHP Z that only does 12.95. Seems slow 2 me. (n/m) posted by teahead on January 30, 2001 at 04:26 PM
Message	And I was not, better put, could not go for a great time. I was really more interested in the MPH right then. 18 inch wheels with street tires is not what you want to run the 1/4 with in this powerful of a car. There was no launch, and from two previous runs, I discovered that I could not come in with full throttle till 3rd, and even then it felt like I was on loose sand. Right now we are finishing up with what will be the last phase of my performance build up. My goal has always been to have an extreme, but totally streetable, NOT just street legal, awesome machine. To this end, I feel once this phase is finished, I will have pushed it about as far as you can and still have a reliable car that you would not be worried about getting caught in traffic in. I will get some slicks or drag radials with some proper wheels when it's ready. At that point I will see what it, and I can really do. Fred 95 300TT SGP Stage..Who knows..lol Dynoed 539.4 RWHP, 481.2 Lbs. Torque Pump Gas @ 17 Lbs. of Boost NO NOS!!
Follow Ups	SCC has a 539rwHP Z that only does 12.95. Seems slow 2 me. (n/m) - teahead 16:26:46 01/30/01 Same as Fred's ( SGP ), they took it easy,,LOL. (n/m) - ZBlacktt 16:35:47 01/30/01 that seems slow did thay push it the first half LOL (n/m) - NONE 16:43:13 01/30/01 that is really not that quick for that type of horespower - gtclk 17:07:31 01/30/01 Yes,I did have some wheel hop. I must address the suspension (n/m) - Good2Zya 19:15:11 01/30/01 I think he's talking about Fred's car in SCC (n/m) - wesman [92TT-less ] 18:10:51 01/30/01 I think you right, I was thinking White TT,,,,,,LOL. - ZBlacktt 22:36:38 01/30/01 Can you say "No traction" Look at the MPH for the real power (n/m) - TwinTurboPete 16:42:37 01/30/01 True 12.95 spinning is pretty quick. (n/m) - NONE 16:45:54 01/30/01 Yes, Fred's was still over 120 mph......@ 12+ sec. (n/m) - ZBlacktt 16:46:15 01/30/01 How can it have no traction?!?!?!?!?!? - NVMYZTT 17:53:24 01/30/01 You probably didnt have 530+RWHP>>>> - NONE 18:03:57 01/30/01 heh, take a look at my stg. 12+ that has all sortsa traction - Bernie 21:28:55 01/30/01 It's my Z NV, not their project car :) (n/m) - Good2Zya 19:09:22 01/30/01 MPH is the true measure of power. What was the speed trap? (n/m) - John Y(Houston) 16:43:49 01/30/01 not as much as some people think - Altered BeaZTT 17:00:06 01/30/01 Yep. - ZHOUND 17:14:59 01/30/01 YEP....I got - SteAmyZ(ztoyz.net©) 20:06:24 01/30/01 It ran a 122+ MPH (n/m) - Good2Zya 19:06:59 01/30/01 easy mid/low 11sec speed.your car is capable of 10's no prob - twinz 09:18:37 01/31/01 122.46mph. Not bad; for 539rwhp. (n/m) - teahead 11:42:59 01/31/01 That's my Z - Good2Zya 19:05:57 01/30/01 hey which issue is it in? i would love to see it >> - maverick (NYC) 09:17:41 01/31/01 From my experience...>>>>>>>>>>>>> - SpdRacr 19:15:01 01/30/01 Questions for Good2Zya and SpdRacr>>>>>> - NONE 19:28:31 01/30/01 Well........... - SpdRacr 19:40:59 01/30/01 Not incouraging but helpfull thanks. (n/m) - NONE 19:54:08 01/30/01 you might want to consider > - Kiwi_Z 20:18:17 01/30/01 Without SERIOUS rear end suspension work, Z's DO NOT hook up - BadZCar (FL) 21:47:50 01/30/01 Well, that's not quite true - Good2Zya 22:07:26 01/30/01 No mentioning of a clutch upgrade. It's probably an auto. - JamesPhotek (StL) 22:43:09 01/30/01 This Z, MY Z is a 5sp. And,if you would bother.. - Good2Zya 23:42:40 01/30/01 Re: This Z, MY Z is a 5sp. And,if you would bother.. - JamesPhotek (StL) 23:51:13 01/30/01 Very new to the forum ,,, I see,,LOL. (n/m) - ZBlacktt 09:05:52 01/31/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.